<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 843 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381766</link>
    <description>Trade annulment under exchange bye-laws is an exceptional remedy available only where the trade is shown to be vitiated by fraud, wilful misrepresentation or material mistake. Here, market orders were placed to square off large client positions on the last trading day and in the closing minutes of a volatile options market. The surrounding facts, including multiple dealers, a supervisor, inconsistent explanations and the trading system&#039;s operation, did not establish a material mistake warranting annulment. The request for annulment was therefore rightly rejected, and the challenged trades were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 06:49:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 843 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381766</link>
      <description>Trade annulment under exchange bye-laws is an exceptional remedy available only where the trade is shown to be vitiated by fraud, wilful misrepresentation or material mistake. Here, market orders were placed to square off large client positions on the last trading day and in the closing minutes of a volatile options market. The surrounding facts, including multiple dealers, a supervisor, inconsistent explanations and the trading system&#039;s operation, did not establish a material mistake warranting annulment. The request for annulment was therefore rightly rejected, and the challenged trades were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>