https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381765 The Tribunal found the freezing of the appellant's bank accounts unjustified as neither the appellant nor her husband were named in any FIR or ECIR. It emphasized the importance of complying with procedural requirements under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and noted the invalidity of the actions taken by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) without substantive evidence. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the freezing order on the appellant's accounts but directed the freezing to continue on her husband's/joint accounts pending further appeals. en-us Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381765 The Tribunal found the freezing of the appellant's bank accounts unjustified as neither the appellant nor her husband were named in any FIR or ECIR. It emphasized the importance of complying with procedural requirements under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and noted the invalidity of the actions taken by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) without substantive evidence. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the freezing order on the appellant's accounts but directed the freezing to continue on her husband's/joint accounts pending further appeals. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381765