<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 842 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381765</link>
    <description>The statutory scheme for search, seizure, freezing and adjudication was treated as a complete code, and continuation of a freezing order had to comply with the prescribed outer time limit and application requirement. Because no timely application for continuation was filed, the freezing of the appellant&#039;s own bank accounts was held unsustainable and set aside. The Tribunal also stated that freezing property under the Act requires material showing reason to believe, recorded reasons and compliance with the statutory procedure; mere suspicion is insufficient. Freezing orders concerning the husband&#039;s or joint accounts were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 842 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381765</link>
      <description>The statutory scheme for search, seizure, freezing and adjudication was treated as a complete code, and continuation of a freezing order had to comply with the prescribed outer time limit and application requirement. Because no timely application for continuation was filed, the freezing of the appellant&#039;s own bank accounts was held unsustainable and set aside. The Tribunal also stated that freezing property under the Act requires material showing reason to believe, recorded reasons and compliance with the statutory procedure; mere suspicion is insufficient. Freezing orders concerning the husband&#039;s or joint accounts were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>