<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1834 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281420</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that imported betel nuts below the specified value were not considered prohibited goods, setting aside the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty orders. The duty paid as per tariff value was upheld, and all appeals and Cross Objections were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1834 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281420</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that imported betel nuts below the specified value were not considered prohibited goods, setting aside the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty orders. The duty paid as per tariff value was upheld, and all appeals and Cross Objections were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>