<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1822 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281419</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the AO&#039;s application of a 27.5% net profit rate for supervisory services, determined that income from the sale of designs and drawings constituted business income, not royalty or FTS, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the sale of equipment, confirming that profits from such sales were not taxable in India. The issues concerning interest computation and penalty proceedings were considered consequential and did not require separate adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:30:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1822 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281419</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the AO&#039;s application of a 27.5% net profit rate for supervisory services, determined that income from the sale of designs and drawings constituted business income, not royalty or FTS, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the sale of equipment, confirming that profits from such sales were not taxable in India. The issues concerning interest computation and penalty proceedings were considered consequential and did not require separate adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>