<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1673 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281417</link>
    <description>The Tribunal decided in favor of the revenue regarding the application of the turnover filter, allowing the removal of the turnover filter. It upheld the exclusion of expenses on telecommunications, freight, and insurance incurred in foreign currency for computing deductions under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal excluded certain companies from the transfer pricing comparables due to functional dissimilarity and directed the computation of Arm&#039;s Length Price based on remaining comparables. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the entire lease rental payments, including both interest and principal, as revenue expenditure, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal on this issue. Both parties&#039; appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:30:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1673 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281417</link>
      <description>The Tribunal decided in favor of the revenue regarding the application of the turnover filter, allowing the removal of the turnover filter. It upheld the exclusion of expenses on telecommunications, freight, and insurance incurred in foreign currency for computing deductions under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal excluded certain companies from the transfer pricing comparables due to functional dissimilarity and directed the computation of Arm&#039;s Length Price based on remaining comparables. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the entire lease rental payments, including both interest and principal, as revenue expenditure, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal on this issue. Both parties&#039; appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>