https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281429 The court acknowledged the petitioner's concerns regarding the delay in implementing GSTR-2 and GSTR-3, leading to the introduction of GSTR-3B. The petitioner faced economic repercussions due to the inability to adjust input credit or seek refunds. The court directed the Revenue's counsel to submit comprehensive responses within four weeks to address the issues raised. The next hearing was set for 24.07.2018, demonstrating the court's proactive approach to resolving complexities in GST compliance and legal uncertainties, emphasizing the importance of adherence to statutory requirements and economic fairness. en-us Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:30:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281429 The court acknowledged the petitioner's concerns regarding the delay in implementing GSTR-2 and GSTR-3, leading to the introduction of GSTR-3B. The petitioner faced economic repercussions due to the inability to adjust input credit or seek refunds. The court directed the Revenue's counsel to submit comprehensive responses within four weeks to address the issues raised. The next hearing was set for 24.07.2018, demonstrating the court's proactive approach to resolving complexities in GST compliance and legal uncertainties, emphasizing the importance of adherence to statutory requirements and economic fairness. Case-Laws GST Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281429