https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281410 A notification extending the Rajasthan (Protection of Tenants) Ordinance, 1949 was treated as a valid legislative extension made with the Rajpramukh's approval, and any defect in form was held not to invalidate it. The Ordinance was also held to operate with overriding effect under its own terms, so earlier criminal procedure proceedings did not displace the special remedy created by the enactment. On that basis, the Board of Revenue's order could not be quashed merely because of prior proceedings under general law, and the petition failed on the substantive grounds raised. en-us Fri, 02 Apr 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:01:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281410 A notification extending the Rajasthan (Protection of Tenants) Ordinance, 1949 was treated as a valid legislative extension made with the Rajpramukh's approval, and any defect in form was held not to invalidate it. The Ordinance was also held to operate with overriding effect under its own terms, so earlier criminal procedure proceedings did not displace the special remedy created by the enactment. On that basis, the Board of Revenue's order could not be quashed merely because of prior proceedings under general law, and the petition failed on the substantive grounds raised. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Apr 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281410