https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281410 The Court upheld the validity of the Rajasthan (Protection of Tenants) Ordinance, 1949, and the extension by the Rajpramukh, ruling that it complied with legal requirements. The Court found that the extension was made by the Rajpramukh in his legislative capacity and met the necessary procedures. Regarding the possession of land, the Court determined that the Ordinance superseded other laws and provided a remedy for dispossession, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondent. The petition was dismissed, with each party bearing its own costs. en-us Fri, 02 Apr 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:01:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281410 The Court upheld the validity of the Rajasthan (Protection of Tenants) Ordinance, 1949, and the extension by the Rajpramukh, ruling that it complied with legal requirements. The Court found that the extension was made by the Rajpramukh in his legislative capacity and met the necessary procedures. Regarding the possession of land, the Court determined that the Ordinance superseded other laws and provided a remedy for dispossession, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondent. The petition was dismissed, with each party bearing its own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Apr 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281410