https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381725 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners on all three issues presented in the case. The impugned letters dated 27.2.2019 were quashed and set aside, holding that the State Tax Officer must act independently without seeking guidance from a higher authority under section 7 of the CST Act. Additionally, the court determined that CST registrations do not automatically become inactive under the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2017, and dealers can hold dual registrations under the GST Act and the CST Act if dealing in goods covered by both Acts. en-us Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jan 2020 12:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381725 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners on all three issues presented in the case. The impugned letters dated 27.2.2019 were quashed and set aside, holding that the State Tax Officer must act independently without seeking guidance from a higher authority under section 7 of the CST Act. Additionally, the court determined that CST registrations do not automatically become inactive under the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2017, and dealers can hold dual registrations under the GST Act and the CST Act if dealing in goods covered by both Acts. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381725