https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381723 The court quashed the Board of Approval's decision rejecting the petitioners' renewal request, granting them a one-year extension of their Letter of Approval. The court found the decision to be discriminatory, arbitrary, and contrary to its previous order, directing equal treatment with other units for future extensions. The ruling deemed the Board's actions as inconsistent and unjustified, emphasizing compliance with court directions and rejecting the alleged policy to phase out plastic recycling units. en-us Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381723 The court quashed the Board of Approval's decision rejecting the petitioners' renewal request, granting them a one-year extension of their Letter of Approval. The court found the decision to be discriminatory, arbitrary, and contrary to its previous order, directing equal treatment with other units for future extensions. The ruling deemed the Board's actions as inconsistent and unjustified, emphasizing compliance with court directions and rejecting the alleged policy to phase out plastic recycling units. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381723