<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 798 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381721</link>
    <description>Statutory power to regulate cattle movement under the Gujarat Essential Commodities and Cattle (Control) Act, 2005 must rest on the required government opinion and a genuine link to supply, distribution, or fair availability; a blanket restriction without that foundation is unsustainable. The notification was also said not to cover cattle merely passing through a drought-affected area for export, because transit movement does not advance the Act&#039;s object. The accompanying withdrawals of health-certification services and police directions for check posts were treated as a colourable use of power to obstruct export, an area falling within Union competence, and were therefore invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 05:50:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 798 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381721</link>
      <description>Statutory power to regulate cattle movement under the Gujarat Essential Commodities and Cattle (Control) Act, 2005 must rest on the required government opinion and a genuine link to supply, distribution, or fair availability; a blanket restriction without that foundation is unsustainable. The notification was also said not to cover cattle merely passing through a drought-affected area for export, because transit movement does not advance the Act&#039;s object. The accompanying withdrawals of health-certification services and police directions for check posts were treated as a colourable use of power to obstruct export, an area falling within Union competence, and were therefore invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>