<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 774 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381697</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the Assessees, emphasizing that expenses must be wholly and necessarily incurred for duty performance to qualify for exemption under section 10(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the allowances were fixed and wholly spent on duties, granting the exemption based on precedent and High Court observations, setting aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 05:48:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 774 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381697</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the Assessees, emphasizing that expenses must be wholly and necessarily incurred for duty performance to qualify for exemption under section 10(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the allowances were fixed and wholly spent on duties, granting the exemption based on precedent and High Court observations, setting aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>