https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18552 The court held that a civil court lacks jurisdiction to challenge orders under the Income-tax Act, citing section 293 of the Act. It addressed the validity of a notice served under section 226(3), suggesting resolution by the Tax Recovery Officer. The representation of the society by Mr. Basant Lal Rawal was disputed, impacting the validity of orders. The court dismissed the revision petition, deeming the civil suit infructuous and directing parties to the Tax Recovery Officer for further proceedings. The decision aimed to conclude the matter efficiently. en-us Tue, 26 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:51:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18552 The court held that a civil court lacks jurisdiction to challenge orders under the Income-tax Act, citing section 293 of the Act. It addressed the validity of a notice served under section 226(3), suggesting resolution by the Tax Recovery Officer. The representation of the society by Mr. Basant Lal Rawal was disputed, impacting the validity of orders. The court dismissed the revision petition, deeming the civil suit infructuous and directing parties to the Tax Recovery Officer for further proceedings. The decision aimed to conclude the matter efficiently. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 26 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18552