<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 763 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381686</link>
    <description>The Respondent was found guilty of not passing on Input Tax Credit (ITC) benefits to buyers post-GST implementation. The court ordered the Respondent to reduce prices accordingly, pass on the profiteered amount of Rs. 99,20,246/- to eligible buyers, and pay interest at 18% per annum. Additionally, a penalty was imposed for issuing incorrect tax invoices under Section 122(1)(i) of the CGST Act, 2017. The Karnataka tax authorities were tasked with overseeing compliance with the court&#039;s directives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 763 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381686</link>
      <description>The Respondent was found guilty of not passing on Input Tax Credit (ITC) benefits to buyers post-GST implementation. The court ordered the Respondent to reduce prices accordingly, pass on the profiteered amount of Rs. 99,20,246/- to eligible buyers, and pay interest at 18% per annum. Additionally, a penalty was imposed for issuing incorrect tax invoices under Section 122(1)(i) of the CGST Act, 2017. The Karnataka tax authorities were tasked with overseeing compliance with the court&#039;s directives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>