<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1514 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281383</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with specific directions to the Assessing Officer regarding the exclusion of certain companies from the list of comparables, the treatment of bad debts, and the computation of deductions under section 10A. The Tribunal provided detailed reasoning for each decision, ensuring adherence to established legal precedents and principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:52:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1514 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281383</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with specific directions to the Assessing Officer regarding the exclusion of certain companies from the list of comparables, the treatment of bad debts, and the computation of deductions under section 10A. The Tribunal provided detailed reasoning for each decision, ensuring adherence to established legal precedents and principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>