https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281379 Lynching, mob violence and vigilantism were treated as antithetical to the rule of law because private groups cannot replace the constitutional and statutory process for investigation, trial and punishment. The SC stressed the State's primary duty to protect life, dignity and public order, prevent hate-driven violence, and secure accountability where officials fail to act. It therefore framed binding guidelines requiring coordinated preventive, remedial and punitive measures, including victim protection, compensation, prosecution, trial management and administrative accountability for non-compliance. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:52:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281379 Lynching, mob violence and vigilantism were treated as antithetical to the rule of law because private groups cannot replace the constitutional and statutory process for investigation, trial and punishment. The SC stressed the State's primary duty to protect life, dignity and public order, prevent hate-driven violence, and secure accountability where officials fail to act. It therefore framed binding guidelines requiring coordinated preventive, remedial and punitive measures, including victim protection, compensation, prosecution, trial management and administrative accountability for non-compliance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281379