<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1821 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281394</link>
    <description>Refund processing was directed once the relevant C-Forms were produced, and the authority was required to pass the refund order within four weeks and credit the refund with interest within two weeks thereafter. Interest for the period when the C-Forms were not available was made subject to the final outcome of the Revenue&#039;s pending appeals before the Supreme Court. The relief therefore depended on production of the C-Forms, while the entitlement to interest for the disputed period remained conditional.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:52:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1821 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281394</link>
      <description>Refund processing was directed once the relevant C-Forms were produced, and the authority was required to pass the refund order within four weeks and credit the refund with interest within two weeks thereafter. Interest for the period when the C-Forms were not available was made subject to the final outcome of the Revenue&#039;s pending appeals before the Supreme Court. The relief therefore depended on production of the C-Forms, while the entitlement to interest for the disputed period remained conditional.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>