https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281401 The court held that the Circular dated July 13, 2016, empowering the Registrar to annul registered documents was ultra vires the Registration Act, 1908. The court set aside the Circular, emphasizing that the Registrar lacks authority to annul registrations post-registration. The writ petition was allowed, affirming that any disputes regarding fraudulent registrations must be resolved through civil court proceedings. The court dismissed the accompanying CM. No. 35206/2018 as infructuous. en-us Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:52:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281401 The court held that the Circular dated July 13, 2016, empowering the Registrar to annul registered documents was ultra vires the Registration Act, 1908. The court set aside the Circular, emphasizing that the Registrar lacks authority to annul registrations post-registration. The writ petition was allowed, affirming that any disputes regarding fraudulent registrations must be resolved through civil court proceedings. The court dismissed the accompanying CM. No. 35206/2018 as infructuous. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281401