<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1645 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281403</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to accept the weighted average method for valuing closing stock for A.Y. 2008-09, dismissing the appeal and finding no substantial question of law. The Court disagreed with the Revenue&#039;s preference for the FIFO method, noting that the weighted average method is an accepted mode for stock valuation and that the appellant&#039;s approach was consistent with previous years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:52:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1645 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281403</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to accept the weighted average method for valuing closing stock for A.Y. 2008-09, dismissing the appeal and finding no substantial question of law. The Court disagreed with the Revenue&#039;s preference for the FIFO method, noting that the weighted average method is an accepted mode for stock valuation and that the appellant&#039;s approach was consistent with previous years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>