https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18546 The court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not heard before the orders were passed. The court quashed the order related to the seized jewellery and directed the second respondent to decide the petitioner's application within six weeks after providing her with a hearing. The court emphasized the importance of hearing parties before passing adverse orders and upheld the petitioner's right to be heard in the matter. en-us Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:37:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18546 The court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not heard before the orders were passed. The court quashed the order related to the seized jewellery and directed the second respondent to decide the petitioner's application within six weeks after providing her with a hearing. The court emphasized the importance of hearing parties before passing adverse orders and upheld the petitioner's right to be heard in the matter. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18546