<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 758 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381681</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ application, allowing direct service on the applicant and instructing them to appear before the Tax Recovery Officer to substantiate the property purchase under Section 281 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tax Recovery Officer was prohibited from taking coercive measures against the applicant until the court-directed proceedings were concluded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2019 06:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 758 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381681</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ application, allowing direct service on the applicant and instructing them to appear before the Tax Recovery Officer to substantiate the property purchase under Section 281 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tax Recovery Officer was prohibited from taking coercive measures against the applicant until the court-directed proceedings were concluded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>