<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 751 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381674</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the interest levy under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 for delayed tax payment in the financial year 2007-08. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming the statutory requirement for interest payment in cases of delayed tax payment. The judgment emphasized that ignorance of the law does not warrant interest waiver and reiterated the obligation to pay interest for delayed tax payments, regardless of the taxpayer&#039;s understanding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 07:13:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 751 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381674</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the interest levy under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 for delayed tax payment in the financial year 2007-08. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming the statutory requirement for interest payment in cases of delayed tax payment. The judgment emphasized that ignorance of the law does not warrant interest waiver and reiterated the obligation to pay interest for delayed tax payments, regardless of the taxpayer&#039;s understanding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>