https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381649 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the refund claim of Rs. 81,533 to be re-processed despite initial rejection due to time limitations. Additionally, the tribunal deemed the cenvat credit of Rs. 1,85,149 valid and accrued to the appellant, setting aside the demand. The appeal was partially allowed, with the judgment delivered on 13.03.2019 by Shri Ramesh Nair, Member (Judicial) at the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad. en-us Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381649 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the refund claim of Rs. 81,533 to be re-processed despite initial rejection due to time limitations. Additionally, the tribunal deemed the cenvat credit of Rs. 1,85,149 valid and accrued to the appellant, setting aside the demand. The appeal was partially allowed, with the judgment delivered on 13.03.2019 by Shri Ramesh Nair, Member (Judicial) at the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381649