https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381647 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD due to the lack of proper representation and authorization by the appellant's counsel, Shri Vikas Mani Srivastava. Despite previous warnings and opportunities given by the Tribunal, the counsel appeared without the necessary authorization, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for the second time. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper authorization and representation in legal proceedings and expressed concern over the appellant's lack of seriousness in pursuing the appeal, ultimately highlighting the necessity of adhering to procedural requirements to ensure the fairness and integrity of the judicial process. en-us Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Jun 2019 07:09:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381647 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD due to the lack of proper representation and authorization by the appellant's counsel, Shri Vikas Mani Srivastava. Despite previous warnings and opportunities given by the Tribunal, the counsel appeared without the necessary authorization, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for the second time. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper authorization and representation in legal proceedings and expressed concern over the appellant's lack of seriousness in pursuing the appeal, ultimately highlighting the necessity of adhering to procedural requirements to ensure the fairness and integrity of the judicial process. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381647