https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381646 The Bench denied the respondent's request for adjournment based on an alleged new plea, clarifying that the plea was not new and had been previously submitted. The respondent's representative disrupted proceedings by walking out, raising objections, and making disrespectful remarks towards the Bench. Despite the disruptions and accusations, the matter was adjourned for both parties to prepare. The judgment emphasized the importance of respect in proceedings and forwarded a copy of the order to higher authorities. en-us Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Jun 2019 07:09:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381646 The Bench denied the respondent's request for adjournment based on an alleged new plea, clarifying that the plea was not new and had been previously submitted. The respondent's representative disrupted proceedings by walking out, raising objections, and making disrespectful remarks towards the Bench. Despite the disruptions and accusations, the matter was adjourned for both parties to prepare. The judgment emphasized the importance of respect in proceedings and forwarded a copy of the order to higher authorities. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381646