<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1439 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281367</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO/TPO to verify and decide on specific issues in accordance with the law. Certain companies were excluded from the list of comparables due to functional dissimilarity and extraordinary events. The Tribunal remitted certain issues back to the AO/TPO for verification and decision, while dismissing other challenges not pressed during the hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2019 06:22:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1439 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281367</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO/TPO to verify and decide on specific issues in accordance with the law. Certain companies were excluded from the list of comparables due to functional dissimilarity and extraordinary events. The Tribunal remitted certain issues back to the AO/TPO for verification and decision, while dismissing other challenges not pressed during the hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>