<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 122 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18538</link>
    <description>Pre-emptive purchase under Chapter XX-C requires a reasoned, objective determination of fair market value on the relevant date, supported by relevant material and reasons showing why the apparent consideration is understated beyond the statutory margin. An order based on assumptions, estimates, or conjecture about construction cost, profit, or valuation does not satisfy that standard. Because the Appropriate Authority did not record a finding of market value as on the agreement date and proceeded on assumed figures, the statutory basis for compulsory purchase was not established and the order was quashed, with directions to issue the no objection certificate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:21:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 122 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18538</link>
      <description>Pre-emptive purchase under Chapter XX-C requires a reasoned, objective determination of fair market value on the relevant date, supported by relevant material and reasons showing why the apparent consideration is understated beyond the statutory margin. An order based on assumptions, estimates, or conjecture about construction cost, profit, or valuation does not satisfy that standard. Because the Appropriate Authority did not record a finding of market value as on the agreement date and proceeded on assumed figures, the statutory basis for compulsory purchase was not established and the order was quashed, with directions to issue the no objection certificate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>