<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 1097 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281363</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeals, upholding the validity of the 1962, 1969, and 2006 Notifications issued by the States of Bihar and Jharkhand, affirming the State Government&#039;s authority to reserve mining areas for public sector undertakings. The Court found that the doctrines of promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation were inapplicable, and the doctrine of desuetude did not apply to the notifications. Additionally, the argument concerning procedural fairness was rejected, as the appellants had no vested right to the grant of mining leases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 1097 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281363</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeals, upholding the validity of the 1962, 1969, and 2006 Notifications issued by the States of Bihar and Jharkhand, affirming the State Government&#039;s authority to reserve mining areas for public sector undertakings. The Court found that the doctrines of promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation were inapplicable, and the doctrine of desuetude did not apply to the notifications. Additionally, the argument concerning procedural fairness was rejected, as the appellants had no vested right to the grant of mining leases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>