<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 798 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281362</link>
    <description>The court quashed the summoning order dated 18.12.2003 against Nicholas Piramal India Ltd., ruling that post-amalgamation, the entity cannot be prosecuted for offences of the transferor company, M/s. Rhone-Poulene (India) Ltd. The court emphasized the separate legal entity of a company and held that the petitioner, having come into existence after the alleged offence, cannot be prosecuted for it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2019 14:51:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 798 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281362</link>
      <description>The court quashed the summoning order dated 18.12.2003 against Nicholas Piramal India Ltd., ruling that post-amalgamation, the entity cannot be prosecuted for offences of the transferor company, M/s. Rhone-Poulene (India) Ltd. The court emphasized the separate legal entity of a company and held that the petitioner, having come into existence after the alleged offence, cannot be prosecuted for it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>