<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (7) TMI 163 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281360</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court clarified the jurisdiction of the High Court under Art. 226 in a bus permit dispute. It criticized the Single Judge for delving into merits and making a final decision instead of remitting the case for reconsideration. The Division Bench&#039;s brief disposal without adequate reasons was deemed insufficient. The Court emphasized the need for a detailed approach and highlighted the importance of public interest in permit grant decisions under the Motor Vehicles Act. The case was remanded for a fresh evaluation by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal (STAT), maintaining the status quo for the respondent to operate the bus until resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2019 11:46:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (7) TMI 163 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281360</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court clarified the jurisdiction of the High Court under Art. 226 in a bus permit dispute. It criticized the Single Judge for delving into merits and making a final decision instead of remitting the case for reconsideration. The Division Bench&#039;s brief disposal without adequate reasons was deemed insufficient. The Court emphasized the need for a detailed approach and highlighted the importance of public interest in permit grant decisions under the Motor Vehicles Act. The case was remanded for a fresh evaluation by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal (STAT), maintaining the status quo for the respondent to operate the bus until resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>