https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281360 Article 226 writ jurisdiction does not permit a High Court to act as an appellate authority by re-evaluating rival claims for a transport permit. Where the statutory authority relies on extraneous considerations or omits relevant public-interest factors under the Motor Vehicles Act, the appropriate course is to set aside the defective decision and remit the matter for fresh consideration. The transport appellate authority must decide the dispute independently, without being influenced by prior observations, and on legally relevant factors. Existing transport operations may continue pending reconsideration. en-us Wed, 23 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jun 2019 11:46:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281360 Article 226 writ jurisdiction does not permit a High Court to act as an appellate authority by re-evaluating rival claims for a transport permit. Where the statutory authority relies on extraneous considerations or omits relevant public-interest factors under the Motor Vehicles Act, the appropriate course is to set aside the defective decision and remit the matter for fresh consideration. The transport appellate authority must decide the dispute independently, without being influenced by prior observations, and on legally relevant factors. Existing transport operations may continue pending reconsideration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281360