https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381639 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, holding that the confiscation orders under Section 130 of the SGST Act against the 6th respondent could not apply to goods belonging to the petitioners. The court directed the authorities to complete proceedings against the 6th respondent within one month and ordered the release of the petitioners' jewellery after this period. Seizure and prohibition orders related to the petitioners' jewellery were quashed to facilitate their release. en-us Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381639 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, holding that the confiscation orders under Section 130 of the SGST Act against the 6th respondent could not apply to goods belonging to the petitioners. The court directed the authorities to complete proceedings against the 6th respondent within one month and ordered the release of the petitioners' jewellery after this period. Seizure and prohibition orders related to the petitioners' jewellery were quashed to facilitate their release. Case-Laws GST Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381639