<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 710 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381633</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice for reopening assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, finding the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer to be adequate and reflecting proper application of mind. The court dismissed the petition, concluding that there was no infirmity in the issuance of the notice and discharged the rule with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 710 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381633</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice for reopening assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, finding the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer to be adequate and reflecting proper application of mind. The court dismissed the petition, concluding that there was no infirmity in the issuance of the notice and discharged the rule with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>