<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 702 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381625</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning lower authorities&#039; decisions. It held the transactions genuine, rejecting the AO&#039;s treatment of sale proceeds as undisclosed income under Section 68. The Tribunal found no direct evidence linking the assessee to dubious activities, emphasizing the provided documentation. Previous cases and lack of direct evidence supported the assessee. The decision was announced on 12 June 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 702 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381625</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning lower authorities&#039; decisions. It held the transactions genuine, rejecting the AO&#039;s treatment of sale proceeds as undisclosed income under Section 68. The Tribunal found no direct evidence linking the assessee to dubious activities, emphasizing the provided documentation. Previous cases and lack of direct evidence supported the assessee. The decision was announced on 12 June 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>