<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 699 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381622</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to consistent charges of concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars of income from initiation to imposition. The penalty was deemed valid based on the unaccounted sales leading to short stock, as confirmed by the CIT(A) and ITAT. The appeal challenging the penalty imposition was dismissed, affirming the legality of the penalty order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 699 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381622</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to consistent charges of concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars of income from initiation to imposition. The penalty was deemed valid based on the unaccounted sales leading to short stock, as confirmed by the CIT(A) and ITAT. The appeal challenging the penalty imposition was dismissed, affirming the legality of the penalty order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>