<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 698 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381621</link>
    <description>Fit-out hire charges received under a separate agreement were treated as business income because the receipts arose from distinct arrangements, one for lease rent and another for fit-out hire charges linked to the smooth running of the lessee&#039;s business. The record showed that the separate contractual terms were disclosed, and precedents on composite rent were found factually distinguishable. Consistent treatment in earlier assessment years also supported the same classification. The charges were therefore not assessed as rent or income from house property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 698 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381621</link>
      <description>Fit-out hire charges received under a separate agreement were treated as business income because the receipts arose from distinct arrangements, one for lease rent and another for fit-out hire charges linked to the smooth running of the lessee&#039;s business. The record showed that the separate contractual terms were disclosed, and precedents on composite rent were found factually distinguishable. Consistent treatment in earlier assessment years also supported the same classification. The charges were therefore not assessed as rent or income from house property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>