https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381615 The court upheld the validity of Notification No. 32/2015-2020 and subsequent notifications restricting the import of peas, emphasizing they were part of a policy decision to protect domestic farmers. The court dismissed challenges regarding retrospective effect, vested rights, legitimate expectation, and lack of rationale, stating that the notifications were not arbitrary and served public interest. Judicial review in economic policy matters was deemed limited, and the court concluded that the notifications were valid and in line with constitutional parameters, ultimately dismissing the petitions. en-us Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jan 2020 14:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381615 The court upheld the validity of Notification No. 32/2015-2020 and subsequent notifications restricting the import of peas, emphasizing they were part of a policy decision to protect domestic farmers. The court dismissed challenges regarding retrospective effect, vested rights, legitimate expectation, and lack of rationale, stating that the notifications were not arbitrary and served public interest. Judicial review in economic policy matters was deemed limited, and the court concluded that the notifications were valid and in line with constitutional parameters, ultimately dismissing the petitions. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381615