<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 690 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381613</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal noted ongoing voting process completion and decided not to issue a specific order on the application by &#039;IDBI Bank Limited.&#039; It directed the &#039;Resolution Professional&#039; to present the &#039;Committee of Creditors&#039; decision post-voting for further instructions. The Tribunal ruled that absent &#039;Financial Creditors&#039; should not be factored in vote counting, citing &#039;Tata Steel Ltd. vs. Liberty House Group Pte. Limited &amp;amp; Ors.&#039; precedent. The case was scheduled for orders with an Interlocutory Application on a specified date, emphasizing procedural fairness and timely resolution in insolvency proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 690 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381613</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal noted ongoing voting process completion and decided not to issue a specific order on the application by &#039;IDBI Bank Limited.&#039; It directed the &#039;Resolution Professional&#039; to present the &#039;Committee of Creditors&#039; decision post-voting for further instructions. The Tribunal ruled that absent &#039;Financial Creditors&#039; should not be factored in vote counting, citing &#039;Tata Steel Ltd. vs. Liberty House Group Pte. Limited &amp;amp; Ors.&#039; precedent. The case was scheduled for orders with an Interlocutory Application on a specified date, emphasizing procedural fairness and timely resolution in insolvency proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>