https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281355 Review jurisdiction under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was recognised as maintainable in appropriate cases where the record discloses a justifiable ground for correction. The Court treated the omission to consider the assessee's written submissions and alternative contention, which had already been placed before the appellate authority, as sufficient to justify recall. On that basis, the earlier order was recalled, the review application was allowed, and the appeal with connected applications was restored for hearing. en-us Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jun 2019 07:49:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281355 Review jurisdiction under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was recognised as maintainable in appropriate cases where the record discloses a justifiable ground for correction. The Court treated the omission to consider the assessee's written submissions and alternative contention, which had already been placed before the appellate authority, as sufficient to justify recall. On that basis, the earlier order was recalled, the review application was allowed, and the appeal with connected applications was restored for hearing. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281355