<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 689 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381612</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the penalty imposition under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, on the appellant for deliberate non-payment of service tax despite awareness of tax liability, citing financial difficulties as the reason. The appellant&#039;s argument against penalty based on lack of willful suppression was rejected, with the Court emphasizing the intentional contravention to evade tax payment. The Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law and affirming the Tribunal&#039;s penalty order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 689 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381612</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the penalty imposition under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, on the appellant for deliberate non-payment of service tax despite awareness of tax liability, citing financial difficulties as the reason. The appellant&#039;s argument against penalty based on lack of willful suppression was rejected, with the Court emphasizing the intentional contravention to evade tax payment. The Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law and affirming the Tribunal&#039;s penalty order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>