<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 682 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381605</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras upheld the extended limitation under Section 11A(1) of the Act for a show cause notice issued to M/s.Velvette International Pharma Product, dismissing the appeal and affirming the validity of the notice. The Court also validated allegations of misdeclaration of the manufacturing process and formula of a product, supporting the invocation of the extended time limit. Additionally, the Court deemed the supplementary show cause notice as valid, allowing the authorities to proceed with the excise duty demands. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the correctness of proving suppression charges and the timeliness of the notices issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2019 07:48:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 682 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381605</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras upheld the extended limitation under Section 11A(1) of the Act for a show cause notice issued to M/s.Velvette International Pharma Product, dismissing the appeal and affirming the validity of the notice. The Court also validated allegations of misdeclaration of the manufacturing process and formula of a product, supporting the invocation of the extended time limit. Additionally, the Court deemed the supplementary show cause notice as valid, allowing the authorities to proceed with the excise duty demands. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the correctness of proving suppression charges and the timeliness of the notices issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>