<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 680 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381603</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the non-specific order-in-original in the case involving the classification of goods under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The tribunal found the order lacked detailed analysis and specific findings for each disputed item, leading to a remand to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision. The appeal was allowed for a re-examination of each product in the classification dispute, emphasizing the necessity for specific and detailed assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:19:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 680 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381603</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the non-specific order-in-original in the case involving the classification of goods under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The tribunal found the order lacked detailed analysis and specific findings for each disputed item, leading to a remand to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision. The appeal was allowed for a re-examination of each product in the classification dispute, emphasizing the necessity for specific and detailed assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>