https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281346 Where a lease of a building includes the site and the site remains intact, destruction of the superstructure does not by itself frustrate the lease under Section 108(e) of the Transfer of Property Act. The tenancy continues if the building is treated as a composite unit with the appurtenant land, and the landlord cannot seek eviction or recovery of possession solely on that basis. However, a tenant has no right to raise fresh unauthorised construction after the original structure collapses, so a mandatory injunction may be granted to remove the unlawful construction. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:23:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281346 Where a lease of a building includes the site and the site remains intact, destruction of the superstructure does not by itself frustrate the lease under Section 108(e) of the Transfer of Property Act. The tenancy continues if the building is treated as a composite unit with the appurtenant land, and the landlord cannot seek eviction or recovery of possession solely on that basis. However, a tenant has no right to raise fresh unauthorised construction after the original structure collapses, so a mandatory injunction may be granted to remove the unlawful construction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281346