https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281346 The court held that the destruction of the leased building's superstructure alone does not automatically terminate the lease if the site remains intact. The lease continues as long as the site is part of the leased property. The court granted a mandatory injunction for the removal of unauthorized structures by the tenant but denied the relief for property recovery. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:23:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281346 The court held that the destruction of the leased building's superstructure alone does not automatically terminate the lease if the site remains intact. The lease continues as long as the site is part of the leased property. The court granted a mandatory injunction for the removal of unauthorized structures by the tenant but denied the relief for property recovery. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281346