<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 588 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281341</link>
    <description>Where a dispute is referable to arbitration, a civil court may treat a suit or application as one for interim relief under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and preserve the status quo pending constitution of the arbitral forum. The court granted interim protection against dispossession of the parties in possession until appointment of the arbitrator and for a short period thereafter, leaving them free to approach the arbitrator for further interim orders. The operative effect is that possession can be safeguarded in aid of arbitration even where civil court proceedings are considered non-maintainable because of an arbitration clause.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:13:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 588 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281341</link>
      <description>Where a dispute is referable to arbitration, a civil court may treat a suit or application as one for interim relief under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and preserve the status quo pending constitution of the arbitral forum. The court granted interim protection against dispossession of the parties in possession until appointment of the arbitrator and for a short period thereafter, leaving them free to approach the arbitrator for further interim orders. The operative effect is that possession can be safeguarded in aid of arbitration even where civil court proceedings are considered non-maintainable because of an arbitration clause.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>