https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281339 The High Court held that applications under Section 34 of the Indian Act were not maintainable for setting aside foreign awards made under English law. The appeals were dismissed, with each party ordered to bear its own costs. The judgment emphasized the significance of specific arbitration agreement terms, which clearly indicated that English law governed the arbitration process. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:01:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281339 The High Court held that applications under Section 34 of the Indian Act were not maintainable for setting aside foreign awards made under English law. The appeals were dismissed, with each party ordered to bear its own costs. The judgment emphasized the significance of specific arbitration agreement terms, which clearly indicated that English law governed the arbitration process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281339