https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281339 Where a contract was governed by Indian law but the arbitration clause provided for arbitration under English law in London, the award was treated as a foreign award governed by English procedural law. Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 did not apply to set aside such awards, and Section 34 was therefore unavailable in India. Any challenge lay before the competent authority under the law governing the arbitration and award, while Section 48 concerned only refusal of enforcement of a foreign award. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:01:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281339 Where a contract was governed by Indian law but the arbitration clause provided for arbitration under English law in London, the award was treated as a foreign award governed by English procedural law. Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 did not apply to set aside such awards, and Section 34 was therefore unavailable in India. Any challenge lay before the competent authority under the law governing the arbitration and award, while Section 48 concerned only refusal of enforcement of a foreign award. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281339