https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281338 Enforcement of a foreign award under Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 proceeds on the statutory grounds in Sections 47 to 49, and objections must be confined to Section 48. A separate civil suit challenging the award does not amount to a Section 34 challenge and does not bar or defer enforcement; the enforcement petition is considered on its own merits. Territorial jurisdiction for enforcement lies with the principal civil court having jurisdiction over the subject matter as if it were a suit, and for a money award it may be exercised where the judgment-debtor has assets available. On that basis, Ahmedabad jurisdiction was upheld and the enforcement objections were rejected. en-us Fri, 05 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:45:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281338 Enforcement of a foreign award under Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 proceeds on the statutory grounds in Sections 47 to 49, and objections must be confined to Section 48. A separate civil suit challenging the award does not amount to a Section 34 challenge and does not bar or defer enforcement; the enforcement petition is considered on its own merits. Territorial jurisdiction for enforcement lies with the principal civil court having jurisdiction over the subject matter as if it were a suit, and for a money award it may be exercised where the judgment-debtor has assets available. On that basis, Ahmedabad jurisdiction was upheld and the enforcement objections were rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281338