https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281337 A foreign award made in Geneva under Swiss curial law and ICC Rules is not amenable to a direct challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, because Section 34 is a Part I remedy for setting aside arbitral awards, while Part II provides a separate scheme for recognition and enforcement of foreign awards. The proper course for the aggrieved party is to resist enforcement when sought, on the grounds available under Section 48, including Section 48(1)(e). en-us Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:40:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281337 A foreign award made in Geneva under Swiss curial law and ICC Rules is not amenable to a direct challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, because Section 34 is a Part I remedy for setting aside arbitral awards, while Part II provides a separate scheme for recognition and enforcement of foreign awards. The proper course for the aggrieved party is to resist enforcement when sought, on the grounds available under Section 48, including Section 48(1)(e). Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281337