https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281337 The Court dismissed the petition challenging a foreign arbitral award made in Geneva, emphasizing that foreign awards cannot be challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It clarified that jurisdictional issues should be determined based on the law, not the parties' conduct, and highlighted the distinction between challenging a foreign award and resisting its enforcement under Section 48. The Court held that the appropriate forum for challenging the foreign award was in Switzerland, where it was issued, and provided interim relief to allow the petitioner to seek further legal remedies. en-us Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:40:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281337 The Court dismissed the petition challenging a foreign arbitral award made in Geneva, emphasizing that foreign awards cannot be challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It clarified that jurisdictional issues should be determined based on the law, not the parties' conduct, and highlighted the distinction between challenging a foreign award and resisting its enforcement under Section 48. The Court held that the appropriate forum for challenging the foreign award was in Switzerland, where it was issued, and provided interim relief to allow the petitioner to seek further legal remedies. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281337