<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (12) TMI 62 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281336</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the validity and enforceability of the jute contracts and arbitration agreements. The plaintiff&#039;s claims regarding the existence of an oral agreement, misconduct by the arbitrators, and the applicability of the Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937, were rejected. The court affirmed that the awards were enforceable and not against the public policy of India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:28:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (12) TMI 62 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281336</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the validity and enforceability of the jute contracts and arbitration agreements. The plaintiff&#039;s claims regarding the existence of an oral agreement, misconduct by the arbitrators, and the applicability of the Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937, were rejected. The court affirmed that the awards were enforceable and not against the public policy of India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>