<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (4) TMI 87 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281335</link>
    <description>A notice issued for externment under the Bombay Police Act is valid if it informs the person in writing of the general nature of the material allegations and enables a reasonable explanation; it need not set out every detailed instance or piece of evidence. On that basis, notices referring to the relevant period, localities, and nature of the alleged acts were held sufficient, and the externment orders were not vitiated for vagueness. The existence of an appellate remedy did not bar writ jurisdiction where the challenge concerned the validity of the notices and the resulting externment orders. The challenge failed on merits, and the externment orders were restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:12:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (4) TMI 87 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281335</link>
      <description>A notice issued for externment under the Bombay Police Act is valid if it informs the person in writing of the general nature of the material allegations and enables a reasonable explanation; it need not set out every detailed instance or piece of evidence. On that basis, notices referring to the relevant period, localities, and nature of the alleged acts were held sufficient, and the externment orders were not vitiated for vagueness. The existence of an appellate remedy did not bar writ jurisdiction where the challenge concerned the validity of the notices and the resulting externment orders. The challenge failed on merits, and the externment orders were restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>