<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (4) TMI 87 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281335</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the notices issued under Section 59 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951, were valid as they provided the general nature of the material allegations against the respondents. The Court found that the allegations were sufficiently specific, and the respondents were given a reasonable opportunity to tender their explanation. The Court also confirmed the competency of the officer passing the externment orders. Despite the availability of an appellate remedy under Section 60 of the Act, the High Court&#039;s decision to entertain the writ petitions was upheld. The Court set aside the Gujarat High Court&#039;s orders, noting that no further action would be taken against the respondents as the period of externment had expired.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:12:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (4) TMI 87 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281335</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the notices issued under Section 59 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951, were valid as they provided the general nature of the material allegations against the respondents. The Court found that the allegations were sufficiently specific, and the respondents were given a reasonable opportunity to tender their explanation. The Court also confirmed the competency of the officer passing the externment orders. Despite the availability of an appellate remedy under Section 60 of the Act, the High Court&#039;s decision to entertain the writ petitions was upheld. The Court set aside the Gujarat High Court&#039;s orders, noting that no further action would be taken against the respondents as the period of externment had expired.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>