<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (7) TMI 164 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281334</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the decree granted by the courts below. The court directed that the trial court consider the partition of property acquired under Ext. A3 if a motion is made within two months and ensure equitable allotment of properties, considering the possession and improvements made by the respective parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:04:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (7) TMI 164 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281334</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the decree granted by the courts below. The court directed that the trial court consider the partition of property acquired under Ext. A3 if a motion is made within two months and ensure equitable allotment of properties, considering the possession and improvements made by the respective parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>