<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (12) TMI 87 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281333</link>
    <description>In externment proceedings, the notice need disclose only the general nature of the material allegations; it need not set out prosecution-style particulars, and a notice giving sufficient locality, conduct, and apprehended activity will satisfy fairness where the person can respond effectively. The authorities are not bound to issue speaking or reasoned orders in such proceedings, because detailed disclosure of evidence would undermine the statutory scheme and witness protection. The externment area may also extend beyond the immediate scene of alleged activity where a wider contiguous area is reasonably necessary and not shown to be arbitrary or disproportionate. On these principles, the externment challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (12) TMI 87 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281333</link>
      <description>In externment proceedings, the notice need disclose only the general nature of the material allegations; it need not set out prosecution-style particulars, and a notice giving sufficient locality, conduct, and apprehended activity will satisfy fairness where the person can respond effectively. The authorities are not bound to issue speaking or reasoned orders in such proceedings, because detailed disclosure of evidence would undermine the statutory scheme and witness protection. The externment area may also extend beyond the immediate scene of alleged activity where a wider contiguous area is reasonably necessary and not shown to be arbitrary or disproportionate. On these principles, the externment challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>