https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381594 The Court allowed the appellant's review application for condonation of delay and demonstrated an error apparent in the original order regarding additions under sections 40A(3) and 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Despite the respondent's argument on the finality of the order under section 260A, the Court acknowledged the error and recalled the original order for further proceedings before the regular Bench. This case emphasizes the significance of rectifying mistakes through review applications, ensuring fairness and justice in legal proceedings under the Income Tax Act. en-us Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:34:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381594 The Court allowed the appellant's review application for condonation of delay and demonstrated an error apparent in the original order regarding additions under sections 40A(3) and 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Despite the respondent's argument on the finality of the order under section 260A, the Court acknowledged the error and recalled the original order for further proceedings before the regular Bench. This case emphasizes the significance of rectifying mistakes through review applications, ensuring fairness and justice in legal proceedings under the Income Tax Act. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381594